lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200107015759.ukyt73lmdj6rv4eh@cantor>
Date:   Mon, 6 Jan 2020 18:57:59 -0700
From:   Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
To:     jimyan <jimyan@...du.com>
Cc:     joro@...tes.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, roland@...estorage.com,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/vt-d: Don't reject nvme host due to scope
 mismatch

On Sun Jan 05 20, jimyan wrote:
>On a system with an Intel PCIe port configured as a nvme host device, iommu
>initialization fails with
>
>    DMAR: Device scope type does not match for 0000:80:00.0
>
>This is because the DMAR table reports this device as having scope 2
>(ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_BRIDGE):
>
>but the device has a type 0 PCI header:
>80:00.0 Class 0600: Device 8086:2020 (rev 06)
>00: 86 80 20 20 47 05 10 00 06 00 00 06 10 00 00 00
>10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 86 80 00 00
>30: 00 00 00 00 90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00
>
>VT-d works perfectly on this system, so there's no reason to bail out
>on initialization due to this apparent scope mismatch. Add the class
>0x06 ("PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE") as a heuristic for allowing DMAR
>initialization for non-bridge PCI devices listed with scope bridge.
>
>Signed-off-by: jimyan <jimyan@...du.com>

Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ