[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200107111836.uzvja6m4nb5hh56j@axis.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:18:36 +0100
From: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Jesper Nilsson <jespern@...s.com>,
Lars Persson <larper@...s.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...s.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: artpec6: fix __iomem on reg in set
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 10:39:34AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 6:32 PM Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk> wrote:
> > On 18/12/2019 16:26, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:16:02AM +0100, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote:
>
> > >> - unsigned int *reg;
> > >> + unsigned int __iomem *reg;
> > >
> > > void __iomem *reg;
> > >
> > > We're using as an argument to readl()?
> >
> > yes, readl() shoud take an __iomem attributed pointer.
>
> Shall I change it to void as well when applying?
Please do, sorry that my comment wasn't clear above.
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@...s.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists