[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200107092230.473d7fc1@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:22:30 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix printing ptrs in preempt/irq
enable/disable events
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:21:55 +0100
Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...com> wrote:
> There are other cases where the trace buffer is under stress, e.g. during function tracing.
> Would it be useful to only store the offset in such cases too?
It could be possible but may require another event type and an option,
as it may break existing tooling.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists