[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200107174914.4187-1-longman@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:49:14 -0500
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] locking/qspinlock: Fix inaccessible URL of MCS lock paper
It turns out that the URL of the MCS lock paper listed in the source
code is no longer accessible. I did got question about where the paper
was. This patch updates the URL to BZ 206115 which contains a copy of
the paper from
https://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/scott/papers/1991_TOCS_synch.pdf
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index 2473f10c6956..b9515fcc9b29 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -31,14 +31,15 @@
/*
* The basic principle of a queue-based spinlock can best be understood
* by studying a classic queue-based spinlock implementation called the
- * MCS lock. The paper below provides a good description for this kind
- * of lock.
+ * MCS lock. A copy of the original MCS lock paper ("Algorithms for Scalable
+ * Synchronization on Shared-Memory Multiprocessors by Mellor-Crummey and
+ * Scott") is available at
*
- * http://www.cise.ufl.edu/tr/DOC/REP-1992-71.pdf
+ * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206115
*
- * This queued spinlock implementation is based on the MCS lock, however to make
- * it fit the 4 bytes we assume spinlock_t to be, and preserve its existing
- * API, we must modify it somehow.
+ * This queued spinlock implementation is based on the MCS lock, however to
+ * make it fit the 4 bytes we assume spinlock_t to be, and preserve its
+ * existing API, we must modify it somehow.
*
* In particular; where the traditional MCS lock consists of a tail pointer
* (8 bytes) and needs the next pointer (another 8 bytes) of its own node to
--
2.18.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists