[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65e976494676a7081b154961ba51048892c2a779.camel@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:11:21 +0100
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>, f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: mbrugger@...e.com, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, hch@....de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM: add bcm2711_defconfig
On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 19:06 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Am 07.01.20 um 18:24 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
> > The Raspberry Pi 4 depends on LPAE in order to use its PCIe port, which
> > is essential, as it ultimately provides USB2/3 connectivity. As this
> > setup doesn't fit any generic purpose configuration this adds
> > bcm2711_defconfig which is based on the current Raspberry Pi foundation
> > config file[1] with as little changes as possible
>
> i really dislike the Foundation config file, because it contains so many
> unnecessary features. Bisecting with such a kernel config is horrible.
>
> How about finding a compromise between bcm2835_defconfig and
> multi_v7_defconfig + LPAE?
If there is a consensus this is the right approach (creating a new config
file), I'll be happy to try that out.
Now that I think of it, maybe we shouldn't add bcm2711_thermal into
multi_v7_defconfig.
Regards,
Nicolas
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists