linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] dt-bindings: mediatek: mt8183: Add #reset-cells

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200107182944.GB22909@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:29:44 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com>, yong.liang@...iatek.com,
        wim@...ux-watchdog.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        chang-an.chen@...iatek.com, freddy.hsin@...iatek.com,
        yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com, sboyd@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] dt-bindings: mediatek: mt8183: Add #reset-cells

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:57:21PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:11:35 +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote:
> > Add #reset-cells property and update example
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: yong.liang <yong.liang@...iatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt  | 10 ++++++---
> >  .../reset-controller/mt2712-resets.h          | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../reset-controller/mt8183-resets.h          | 17 ++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mt2712-resets.h
> > 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

v9 and a couple of versions before that did not include the update to
the bindings file. I got lost in the many versions and don't recall if
that was ever tagged as Reviewed-by: in an earlier version.

Guenter