[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200107184926.GL29542@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:49:26 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Yuqing Shen <yuqing.shen@...adcom.com>,
Lei Wang <lewan@...rosoft.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: EDAC driver for DMC520
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:57:26AM -0800, Scott Branden wrote:
> Hello EDAC Maintainers,
>
> Could somebody have a look at the DMC520 patch series that has been waiting
> for a response since November:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11248785/
Well, the dt bindings stuff is still being discussed:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11248783/
Also, looking at this again, the patch authorship looks really fishy:
Sender is
From: Shiping Ji <shiping.linux@...il.com>
however, he doesn't have his SOB in there and previous iterations were
done with Lei Wang whose SOB *is* there so I dunno what's going on.
*Especially* if Lei Wang is being added as a maintainer of that driver
by the second patch but he's not sending this driver himself. If this
driver is going to be orphaned the moment it lands upstream, I'm not
going to take it.
So at least those two things need to be fixed/clarified first.
HTH.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists