linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] usb: xhci: Add support for Renesas USB controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANcMJZDqX6-+naGEbBiyM+1cZS6jfMoP9bm5Uk4ZuP_mw5aNWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:51:11 -0800
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Alistair Delva <adelva@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] usb: xhci: Add support for Renesas USB controllers

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:40 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> This series add support for Renesas USB controllers uPD720201 and uPD720202.
> These require firmware to be loaded and in case devices have ROM those can
> also be programmed if empty. If ROM is programmed, it runs from ROM as well.
>
> This includes two patches from Christian which supported these controllers
> w/o ROM and later my patches for ROM support and multiple firmware versions.
>

Hey Vinod!
   In pushing this series to one of the Android trees for the db845c,
there was some concern raised that this series is adding a lot of
renesas specific logic to the more generic xhci-pci driver. There was
some question if instead that logic should be added to its own
file/module? Do you have any thoughts on this?

Also, It seems there hasn't been much feedback on this for a few
months now. Is there a newer version of the patchset I should sync
with? Do you have plans to resubmit soon?

thanks
-john