[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200108001859.25254-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 16:18:59 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix a benign Bitwise vs. Logical OR mixup
Use a Logical OR in __is_rsvd_bits_set() to combine the two reserved bit
checks, which are obviously intended to be logical statements. Switching
to a Logical OR is functionally a nop, but allows the compiler to better
optimize the checks.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 7269130ea5e2..72e845709027 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3970,7 +3970,7 @@ __is_rsvd_bits_set(struct rsvd_bits_validate *rsvd_check, u64 pte, int level)
{
int bit7 = (pte >> 7) & 1, low6 = pte & 0x3f;
- return (pte & rsvd_check->rsvd_bits_mask[bit7][level-1]) |
+ return (pte & rsvd_check->rsvd_bits_mask[bit7][level-1]) ||
((rsvd_check->bad_mt_xwr & (1ull << low6)) != 0);
}
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists