linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 08/17] KVM: X86: Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 20:44:32 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Lei Cao <lei.cao@...atus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 08/17] KVM: X86: Implement ring-based dirty
 memory tracking

On 08/01/20 20:06, Peter Xu wrote:
>> The kvmgt patches were posted, you could just include them in your next
>> series and clean everything up.  You can get them at
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11316219/.
> Good to know!
> 
> Maybe I'll simply drop all the redundants in the dirty ring series
> assuming it's there?  Since these patchsets should not overlap with
> each other (so looks more like an ordering constraints for merging).

Just include the patches, we'll make sure to get an ACK from Alex.

Paolo