[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABWYdi25Y=zrfdnitT3sSgC3UqcFHfz6-N2YP7h2TJai=JH_zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 11:47:10 -0800
From: Ivan Babrou <ivan@...udflare.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Lower than expected CPU pressure in PSI
We added reporting for PSI in cgroups and results are somewhat surprising.
My test setup consists of 3 services:
* stress-cpu1-no-contention.service : taskset -c 1 stress --cpu 1
* stress-cpu2-first-half.service : taskset -c 2 stress --cpu 1
* stress-cpu2-second-half.service : taskset -c 2 stress --cpu 1
First service runs unconstrained, the other two compete for CPU.
As expected, I can see 500ms/s sched delay for the latter two and
aggregated 1000ms/s delay for /system.slice, no surprises here.
However, CPU pressure reported by PSI says that none of my services
have any pressure on them. I can see around 434ms/s pressure on
/unified/system.slice and 425ms/s pressure on /unified cgroup, which
is surprising for three reasons:
* Pressure is absent for my services (I expect it to match scheed delay)
* Pressure on /unified/system.slice is lower than both 500ms/s and 1000ms/s
* Pressure on root cgroup is lower than on system.slice
I'm running Linux 5.4.8 with hybrid cgroup hierarchy under systemd.
P.S.: ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl kernel/sched/psi.c does not say
Johannes Weiner is a maintainer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists