| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 14:41:35 +0530
From: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>, acme@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/metricgroup: Fix printing event names of
metric group with multiple events incase of overlapping events
On 1/8/20 12:55 PM, Jin, Yao wrote:
>
>
> On 1/8/2020 2:58 PM, Kajol Jain wrote:
>> Commit f01642e4912b ("perf metricgroup: Support multiple
>> events for metricgroup") introduced support for multiple events
>> in a metric group. But with the current upstream, metric events
>> names are not printed properly incase we try to run multiple
>> metric groups with overlapping event.
>>
>> With current upstream version, incase of overlapping metric events
>> issue is, we always start our comparision logic from start.
>> So, the events which already matched with some metric group also
>> take part in comparision logic. Because of that when we have overlapping
>> events, we end up matching current metric group event with already
>> matched
>> one.
>>
>> For example, in skylake machine we have metric event CoreIPC and
>> Instructions. Both of them need 'inst_retired.any' event value.
>> As events in Instructions is subset of events in CoreIPC, they
>> endup in pointing to same 'inst_retired.any' value.
>>
>> In skylake platform:
>>
>> command:# ./perf stat -M CoreIPC,Instructions -C 0 sleep 1
>>
>> Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
>>
>> 1,254,992,790 inst_retired.any # 1254992790.0
>> Instructions
>> # 1.3 CoreIPC
>> 977,172,805 cycles
>> 1,254,992,756 inst_retired.any
>>
>> 1.000802596 seconds time elapsed
>>
>> command:# sudo ./perf stat -M UPI,IPC sleep 1
>>
>> Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
>>
>> 948,650 uops_retired.retire_slots
>> 866,182 inst_retired.any # 0.7 IPC
>> 866,182 inst_retired.any
>> 1,175,671 cpu_clk_unhalted.thread
>>
>> Patch fixes the issue by adding a static variable 'iterator_perf_evlist'
>> to keep track of events which already matched with some group. It points
>> to event in perf_evlist from where next match should start. Because we
>> need to make sure, we match correct set of events belongs to
>> corresponding metric group.
>>
>> With this patch:
>> In skylake platform:
>>
>> command:# ./perf stat -M CoreIPC,Instructions -C 0 sleep 1
>>
>> Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
>>
>> 149,481,533 inst_retired.any # 0.8 CoreIPC
>> 186,244,218 cycles
>> 149,479,362 inst_retired.any # 149479362.0
>> Instructions
>>
>> 1.001655885 seconds time elapsed
>>
>> command:# ./perf stat -M UPI,IPC sleep 1
>> Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
>>
>> 16,858,849 uops_retired.retire_slots # 1.3 UPI
>> 12,529,178 inst_retired.any
>> 12,529,558 inst_retired.any # 0.3 IPC
>> 39,936,071 cpu_clk_unhalted.thread
>>
>> 1.001413978 seconds time elapsed
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
>> b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
>> index 35e151b8359b..58889b0496fb 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
>> @@ -90,16 +90,21 @@ struct egroup {
>> const char *metric_unit;
>> };
>> +static int iterator_perf_evlist;
>> +
>> static struct evsel *find_evsel_group(struct evlist *perf_evlist,
>> const char **ids,
>> int idnum,
>> struct evsel **metric_events)
>> {
>> struct evsel *ev;
>> - int i = 0;
>> + int i = 0, j = 0;
>> bool leader_found;
>> evlist__for_each_entry (perf_evlist, ev) {
>> + j++;
>> + if (j <= iterator_perf_evlist)
>> + continue;
>> if (!strcmp(ev->name, ids[i])) {
>> if (!metric_events[i])
>> metric_events[i] = ev;
>> @@ -146,6 +151,7 @@ static struct evsel *find_evsel_group(struct
>> evlist *perf_evlist,
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> + iterator_perf_evlist = j;
>> return metric_events[0];
>> }
>>
>
> Thanks for reporting and fixing this issue.
>
> I just have one question, do we really need a *static variable* to
> track the matched events? Perhaps using an input parameter?
Hi Jin,
The other way I come up with to solve this issue is, making change in
perf_evlist itself by adding some flag in event name, to keep track of
matched events.
As if we change event name itself, next time when we compare it won't
matched. But in that case we need to remove those flag later. Which will
increase the
complexity. If you have any suggestions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Kajol
>
> Thanks
> Jin Yao
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists