linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] net: stmmac: remove useless code of phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 19:26:52 +0800
From:   Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>
To:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Cc:     "peppe.cavallaro@...com" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        "alexandre.torgue@...com" <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        "martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com" 
        <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        "treding@...dia.com" <treding@...dia.com>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "weifeng.voon@...el.com" <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] net: stmmac: remove useless code of phy_mask

On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 07:57:14AM +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> From: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>
> Date: Jan/08/2020, 07:25:48 (UTC+00:00)
> 
> > Changes since v1:
> > 	1, add a new commit for remove the useless member phy_mask.
> 
> No, this is not useless. It's an API for developers that need only 
> certain PHYs to be detected. Please do not remove this.
>
Hi Jose:

Okay, If you think it is a feature that needs to be retained, I will
abandon it. since I am a newbie, after that, Do I need to update the
other commit in this patchset for patch v3? Thanks!

BR,
dejin

> ---
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu