lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1b75d07-17ab-5dec-aa40-b9cff247eabf@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:42:40 +0200
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ulf.hansson@...aro.org, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix issues with command queuing in arasan controllers

On 8/01/20 1:30 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 30/12/19 2:53 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>> In some Arasan SDHCI controllers, after tuning, the tuning pattern data
>> is leftover in the sdhci buffer. This leads to issues with future data
>> commands, especially when command queuing is enabled. The following
>> patches help fix this issue by resetting data lines after tuning is
>> finished. The first two patches have been tested with TI's am65x and
>> j721e SoCs using the sdhci_am654 driver.
>>
>> I have a strong suspicion that this is the same issue with
>> the sdhci-of-arasan driver where they are forced to dump data from the
>> buffer before enabling command queuing. I need help from someone with a
>> compatible platform to test this.
>>
> 
> I had some discussions with our hardware team and they say we should be
> asserting both SRC and SRD reset after tuning to start from a clean
> state. Will update the patches to do that in v2.

Can you use the ->execute_tuning() for that instead of a quirk?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ