linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 12/13] gpiolib: add new ioctl() for monitoring changes in line info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 14:46:50 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/13] gpiolib: add new ioctl() for monitoring changes
 in line info

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 01:07:08PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> 
> Currently there is no way for user-space to be informed about changes
> in status of GPIO lines e.g. when someone else requests the line or its
> config changes. We can only periodically re-read the line-info. This
> is fine for simple one-off user-space tools, but any daemon that provides
> a centralized access to GPIO chips would benefit hugely from an event
> driven line info synchronization.
> 
> This patch adds a new ioctl() that allows user-space processes to reuse
> the file descriptor associated with the character device for watching
> any changes in line properties. Every such event contains the updated
> line information.
> 
> Currently the events are generated on three types of status changes: when
> a line is requested, when it's released and when its config is changed.
> The first two are self-explanatory. For the third one: this will only
> happen when another user-space process calls the new SET_CONFIG ioctl()
> as any changes that can happen from within the kernel (i.e.
> set_transitory() or set_debounce()) are of no interest to user-space.

...

> -	} else if (cmd == GPIO_GET_LINEINFO_IOCTL) {
> +	} else if (cmd == GPIO_GET_LINEINFO_IOCTL ||
> +		   cmd == GPIO_GET_LINEINFO_WATCH_IOCTL) {

What about to split the functionality to something like lineinfo_get() and...

>  		struct gpioline_info lineinfo;

> -		struct gpio_desc *desc;

Hmm... Is it correct patch for this change?

>  
>  		if (copy_from_user(&lineinfo, ip, sizeof(lineinfo)))
>  			return -EFAULT;
> @@ -1246,11 +1260,25 @@ static long gpio_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  
>  		if (copy_to_user(ip, &lineinfo, sizeof(lineinfo)))
>  			return -EFAULT;
> +
> +		if (cmd == GPIO_GET_LINEINFO_WATCH_IOCTL)
> +			set_bit(desc_to_gpio(desc), priv->watched_lines);
> +

...simple use

	} else if (cmd == GPIO_GET_LINEINFO_IOCTL) {
		return lineinfo_get();
	} else if {cmd == GPIO_GET_LINEINFO_WATCH_IOCTL) {
		ret = lineinfo_get()
		set_bit();
		return ret;
	}

?

>  		return 0;

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko