[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200108134448.GG2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 14:44:48 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
valentin.schneider@....com, qperret@...gle.com,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@...bug.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Add a new sysctl to control uclamp_util_min
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:48:38PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> RT tasks by default try to run at the highest capacity/performance
> level. When uclamp is selected this default behavior is retained by
> enforcing the uclamp_util_min of the RT tasks to be
> uclamp_none(UCLAMP_MAX), which is SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE; the maximum
> value.
>
> See commit 1a00d999971c ("sched/uclamp: Set default clamps for RT tasks").
>
> On battery powered devices, this default behavior could consume more
> power, and it is desired to be able to tune it down. While uclamp allows
> tuning this by changing the uclamp_util_min of the individual tasks, but
> this is cumbersome and error prone.
>
> To control the default behavior globally by system admins and device
> integrators, introduce the new sysctl_sched_rt_uclamp_util_min to
> change the default uclamp_util_min value of the RT tasks.
>
> Whenever the new default changes, it'd be applied on the next wakeup of
> the RT task, assuming that it still uses the system default value and
> not a user applied one.
This is because these RT tasks are not in a cgroup or not affected by
cgroup settings? I feel the justification is a little thin here.
> If the uclamp_util_min of an RT task is 0, then the RT utilization of
> the rq is used to drive the frequency selection in schedutil for RT
> tasks.
Did cpu_uclamp_write() forget to check for input<0 ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists