linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] DT: bindings: Add cooling cells for idle states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200108140333.GA12276@bogus>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 08:03:33 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] DT: bindings: Add cooling cells for idle states

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:19:27PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Add DT documentation to add an idle state as a cooling device. The CPU
> is actually the cooling device but the definition is already used by
> frequency capping. As we need to make cpufreq capping and idle
> injection to co-exist together on the system in order to mitigate at
> different trip points, the CPU can not be used as the cooling device
> for idle injection. The idle state can be seen as an hardware feature
> and therefore as a component for the passive mitigation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

This is now a schema in my tree. Can you rebase on that and I'll pick up 
the binding change.

Rob