[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200108144600.GK30908@localhost>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 15:46:00 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: "Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)" <hpeter@...il.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peter_hong@...tek.com.tw,
"Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)" <hpeter+linux_kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/7] USB: serial: f81232: Add gpiolib to GPIO device
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:00:12AM +0800, Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong) wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> Johan Hovold 於 2019/10/23 下午 08:22 寫道:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:24:49AM +0800, Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong) wrote:
> >> The Fintek F81534A series contains 3 GPIOs per UART and The max GPIOs
> >> is 12x3 = 36 GPIOs and this patch will implements GPIO device as a
> >> gpiochip to control all GPIO pins even transforms to transceiver pins.
> >
> > Depending to your answer to my question whether these pins are truly
> > general purpose or not, this may not be the right interface.
>
> Our F81534A series contains F81532A/534A/535/536. For the following link
> of F81534A pin-out:
> https://imgur.com/a/AZHqQ1N
>
> We had 2 type about GPIO pins, MODEx_y & GPIOxx. All MODEx_y & GPIOxx
> are GPIOs and can be controlled by GPIO device, but they had some
> difference about usage.
> MODEx_y:
> 1. 3 pins(x: 0/1/2) can be access by UART port y.
> 2. Used to control UART's transceiver normally, but it
> also can be configure as GPIO when UART disabled by
> H/W (DTR strap to GND).
> GPIOxx:
> 1. Access only by GPIO device.
>
> The series patch only support RS233 mode for all serial port, So we'll
> direct set all MODEx_y to (0/0/1) for our demo board for default. If
> user really want to use the pin, we had provide the gpiolib with GPIO
> device, but we'll recommend user to use GPIOxy first.
Do you mean that you'd need to register a separate gpio chip per port in
order to expose an interface for changing the MODEx_y pins for an
enabled UART? Or can you do that through the "global" gpio device?
> Is any suggest about this ? Could I maintain this for this series patch?
I understood from your other mail that the gpio device would not be able
to control the pins of an enabled port. In either case, I think you need
to refuse a request for a pin that's already in use by the corresponding
port.
Also is there a way to determine the number of available pins by
detecting the chip/package type? I'm assuming not all 36 pins are always
accessible?
> >> + status = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&intf->dev, &priv->chip, priv);
> >> + if (status) {
> >> + dev_err(&intf->dev, "failed to register gpiochip: %d\n",
> >> + status);
> >> + return status;
> >> + }
> >
> > Have you tried disconnecting the device with gpios requested? This used
> > to break gpiolib, but was fixed. Just want to make sure it hasn't
> > regressed.
>
> I had try export GPIOs and detach the F81534A in kernel 5.0.0, it seems
> no problem. Is any link about this issue for me to do more test ?
Then it's hopefully fine. Thanks for verifying.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists