[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3826a83d-a220-2f7d-59f6-efe8a4b995d7@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 17:10:26 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"saravanak@...gle.com" <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: Use list_del_init to replace list_del at
device_links_purge()
On 08/01/2020 16:08, John Garry wrote:
> On 08/01/2020 16:01, James Bottomley wrote:
>>>>> cdev->dev = NULL;
>>>>> return device_add(&cdev->cdev);
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>> }
>>>> The design of the code is simply to remove the link to the inserted
>>>> device which has been removed.
>>>>
>>>> I*think* this means the calls to device_del and device_add are
>>>> unnecessary and should go. enclosure_remove_links and the put of
>>>> the
>>>> enclosed device should be sufficient.
>>> That would make more sense than trying to "reuse" the device
>>> structure
>>> here by tearing it down and adding it back.
>> OK, let's try that. This should be the patch if someone can try it
>> (I've compile tested it, but the enclosure system is under a heap of
>> stuff in the garage).
>
> I can test it now.
>
Yeah, that looks to have worked ok. SES disk locate was also fine after
losing and rediscovering the disk.
Thanks,
John
> But it is a bit suspicious that we had the device_del() and device_add()
> at all, especially since the code change makes it look a bit more like
> pre-43d8eb9cfd0 ("ses: add support for enclosure component hot removal")
>
> John
>
>>
>> James
>>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/enclosure.c b/drivers/misc/enclosure.c
>> index 6d27ccfe0680..3c2d405bc79b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/enclosure.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/enclosure.c
>> @@ -406,10 +406,9 @@ int enclosure_remove_device(struct
>> enclosure_device *edev, struct device *dev)
>> cdev = &edev->component[i];
>> if (cdev->dev == dev) {
>> enclosure_remove_links(cdev);
>> - device_del(&cdev->cdev);
>> put_device(dev);
>> cdev->dev = NULL;
>> - return device_add(&cdev->cdev);
>> + return 0;
>> }
>> }
>> return -ENODEV;
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxarm mailing list
> Linuxarm@...wei.com
> http://hulk.huawei.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxarm
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists