linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 06/17] KVM: Pass in kvm pointer into mark_page_dirty_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8d784ead-44f8-8ebc-6192-be1b4eec6ff8@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:47:34 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 06/17] KVM: Pass in kvm pointer into
 mark_page_dirty_in_slot()

On 21/12/19 02:49, Peter Xu wrote:
> The context will be needed to implement the kvm dirty ring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index c80a363831ae..17969cf110dd 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,9 @@ static void hardware_disable_all(void);
>  
>  static void kvm_io_bus_destroy(struct kvm_io_bus *bus);
>  
> -static void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, gfn_t gfn);
> +static void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				    struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> +				    gfn_t gfn);
>  
>  __visible bool kvm_rebooting;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_rebooting);
> @@ -2053,8 +2055,9 @@ int kvm_vcpu_read_guest_atomic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_read_guest_atomic);
>  
> -static int __kvm_write_guest_page(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, gfn_t gfn,
> -			          const void *data, int offset, int len,
> +static int __kvm_write_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				  struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, gfn_t gfn,
> +				  const void *data, int offset, int len,
>  				  bool track_dirty)
>  {
>  	int r;
> @@ -2067,7 +2070,7 @@ static int __kvm_write_guest_page(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, gfn_t gfn,
>  	if (r)
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	if (track_dirty)
> -		mark_page_dirty_in_slot(memslot, gfn);
> +		mark_page_dirty_in_slot(kvm, memslot, gfn);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2077,7 +2080,7 @@ int kvm_write_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
>  {
>  	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
>  
> -	return __kvm_write_guest_page(slot, gfn, data, offset, len,
> +	return __kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, slot, gfn, data, offset, len,
>  				      track_dirty);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_guest_page);
> @@ -2087,7 +2090,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_write_guest_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
>  {
>  	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gfn);
>  
> -	return __kvm_write_guest_page(slot, gfn, data, offset,
> +	return __kvm_write_guest_page(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn, data, offset,
>  				      len, true);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_write_guest_page);
> @@ -2202,7 +2205,7 @@ int kvm_write_guest_offset_cached(struct kvm *kvm, struct gfn_to_hva_cache *ghc,
>  	r = __copy_to_user((void __user *)ghc->hva + offset, data, len);
>  	if (r)
>  		return -EFAULT;
> -	mark_page_dirty_in_slot(ghc->memslot, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	mark_page_dirty_in_slot(kvm, ghc->memslot, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -2269,7 +2272,8 @@ int kvm_clear_guest(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, unsigned long len)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_clear_guest);
>  
> -static void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> +static void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				    struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>  				    gfn_t gfn)
>  {
>  	if (memslot && memslot->dirty_bitmap) {
> @@ -2284,7 +2288,7 @@ void mark_page_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
>  	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
>  
>  	memslot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
> -	mark_page_dirty_in_slot(memslot, gfn);
> +	mark_page_dirty_in_slot(kvm, memslot, gfn);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mark_page_dirty);
>  
> @@ -2293,7 +2297,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
>  	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
>  
>  	memslot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gfn);
> -	mark_page_dirty_in_slot(memslot, gfn);
> +	mark_page_dirty_in_slot(vcpu->kvm, memslot, gfn);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty);
>  
> 

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>