[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <583d04b4-73d2-0ba7-fda6-10e15071a3c4@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:42:40 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Kevin Kevin <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] KVM: Dirty ring interface
On 09/01/20 20:39, Peter Xu wrote:
>>
>> IIUC at the moment KVM never uses huge pages if any part of the huge page is
>> tracked.
>
> To be more precise - I think it's per-memslot. Say, if the memslot is
> dirty tracked, then no huge page on the host on that memslot (even if
> guest used huge page over that).
>
>> But if all parts of the page are written to then huge page
>> is used.
>
> I'm not sure of this... I think it's still in 4K granularity.
Right. Dirty tracking always uses 4K page size.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists