[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6b69cb6-b784-0d6c-efaf-87926c20db16@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:12:21 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] clocksource: davinci: only enable tim34 in
periodic mode once it's initialized
On 24/12/2019 11:03, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> The DM365 platform has a strange quirk (only present when using ancient
> u-boot - mainline u-boot v2013.01 and later works fine) where if we
> enable the second half of the timer in periodic mode before we do its
> initialization - the time won't start flowing and we can't boot.
>
> When using more recent u-boot, we can enable the timer, then reinitialize
> it and all works fine.
>
> I've been unable to figure out why that is, but a workaround for this
> is straightforward - don't enable the tim34 timer in periodic mode until
> it's properly initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/timer-davinci.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-davinci.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-davinci.c
> index 62745c962049..2801f21bb0e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-davinci.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static struct {
> struct clocksource dev;
> void __iomem *base;
> unsigned int tim_off;
> + bool initialized;
> } davinci_clocksource;
>
> static struct davinci_clockevent *
> @@ -94,8 +95,9 @@ static void davinci_tim12_shutdown(void __iomem *base)
> * halves. In this case TIM34 runs in periodic mode and we must
> * not modify it.
> */
> - tcr |= DAVINCI_TIMER_ENAMODE_PERIODIC <<
> - DAVINCI_TIMER_ENAMODE_SHIFT_TIM34;
> + if (likely(davinci_clocksource.initialized))
> + tcr |= DAVINCI_TIMER_ENAMODE_PERIODIC <<
> + DAVINCI_TIMER_ENAMODE_SHIFT_TIM34;
>
> writel_relaxed(tcr, base + DAVINCI_TIMER_REG_TCR);
> }
> @@ -107,8 +109,9 @@ static void davinci_tim12_set_oneshot(void __iomem *base)
> tcr = DAVINCI_TIMER_ENAMODE_ONESHOT <<
> DAVINCI_TIMER_ENAMODE_SHIFT_TIM12;
> /* Same as above. */
> - tcr |= DAVINCI_TIMER_ENAMODE_PERIODIC <<
> - DAVINCI_TIMER_ENAMODE_SHIFT_TIM34;
> + if (likely(davinci_clocksource.initialized))
> + tcr |= DAVINCI_TIMER_ENAMODE_PERIODIC <<
> + DAVINCI_TIMER_ENAMODE_SHIFT_TIM34;
>
> writel_relaxed(tcr, base + DAVINCI_TIMER_REG_TCR);
> }
> @@ -206,6 +209,8 @@ static void davinci_clocksource_init_tim34(void __iomem *base)
> writel_relaxed(0x0, base + DAVINCI_TIMER_REG_TIM34);
> writel_relaxed(UINT_MAX, base + DAVINCI_TIMER_REG_PRD34);
> writel_relaxed(tcr, base + DAVINCI_TIMER_REG_TCR);
> +
> + davinci_clocksource.initialized = true;
> }
Why not move clockevents_config_and_register() after
davinci_clocksource_init_tim34() is called ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists