lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200109074445.73n3vapjl4vfjtsu@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:44:45 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: sun4i: Fix inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR

Hello Gustavo,

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:27:35AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Fix inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in sun4i_pwm_probe().
> 
> The proper pointers to be passed as arguments are pwm->clk and pwm->bus_clk.
> 
> This bug was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> Fixes: b8d74644f34a ("pwm: sun4i: Prefer "mod" clock to unnamed")
> Fixes: 5b090b430d75 ("pwm: sun4i: Add an optional probe for bus clock")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> index 1afd41ebd3fd..a805c347ee84 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	 */
>  	pwm->clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "mod");
>  	if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk)) {
> -		if (PTR_ERR(pwm->rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +		if (PTR_ERR(pwm->clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)

How embarrassing that I didn't notice these. Thanks for catching.

Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ