linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: intel: Add GPIO <-> pin mapping ranges via callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200109075329.398347-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu,  9 Jan 2020 08:53:28 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: intel: Add GPIO <-> pin mapping ranges via callback

When IRQ chip is instantiated via GPIO library flow, the few functions,
in particular the ACPI event registration mechanism, on some of ACPI based
platforms expect that the pin ranges are initialized to that point.

Add GPIO <-> pin mapping ranges via callback in the GPIO library flow.

Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
---
Please apply this to the Intel pinctrl tree when you're pleased
with it!
---
 drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
index 4860bc9a4e48..b479bcf1e246 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
@@ -1160,8 +1160,8 @@ static irqreturn_t intel_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
-				     const struct intel_community *community)
+static int intel_gpio_add_community_ranges(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
+				const struct intel_community *community)
 {
 	int ret = 0, i;
 
@@ -1181,6 +1181,24 @@ static int intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges(struct gpio_chip *gc)
+{
+	struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	int ret, i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < pctrl->ncommunities; i++) {
+		struct intel_community *community = &pctrl->communities[i];
+
+		ret = intel_gpio_add_community_ranges(pctrl, community);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(pctrl->dev, "failed to add GPIO pin range\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static unsigned int intel_gpio_ngpio(const struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl)
 {
 	const struct intel_community *community;
@@ -1205,7 +1223,7 @@ static unsigned int intel_gpio_ngpio(const struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl)
 
 static int intel_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, int irq)
 {
-	int ret, i;
+	int ret;
 
 	pctrl->chip = intel_gpio_chip;
 
@@ -1214,6 +1232,7 @@ static int intel_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, int irq)
 	pctrl->chip.label = dev_name(pctrl->dev);
 	pctrl->chip.parent = pctrl->dev;
 	pctrl->chip.base = -1;
+	pctrl->chip.add_pin_ranges = intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges;
 	pctrl->irq = irq;
 
 	/* Setup IRQ chip */
@@ -1231,16 +1250,6 @@ static int intel_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, int irq)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < pctrl->ncommunities; i++) {
-		struct intel_community *community = &pctrl->communities[i];
-
-		ret = intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges(pctrl, community);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(pctrl->dev, "failed to add GPIO pin range\n");
-			return ret;
-		}
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * We need to request the interrupt here (instead of providing chip
 	 * to the irq directly) because on some platforms several GPIO
-- 
2.23.0