linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: stm32: update mlahb node according to the bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1df021db-98c4-706d-391a-393c40a3aff3@st.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:46:12 +0100
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:     <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: stm32: update mlahb node according to the
 bindings

Hi Arnaud

On 12/19/19 1:18 PM, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> Update of the mlahb node according to to DT bindings using json-schema
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
> index 3dd570b10181..047051c56ef7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
> @@ -1669,10 +1669,11 @@
>   		};
>   	};
>   
> -	mlahb {
> -		compatible = "simple-bus";
> +	mlahb: ahb {
> +		compatible = "st,mlahb", "simple-bus";
>   		#address-cells = <1>;
>   		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges;
>   		dma-ranges = <0x00000000 0x38000000 0x10000>,
>   			     <0x10000000 0x10000000 0x60000>,
>   			     <0x30000000 0x30000000 0x60000>;
> 

Applied on stm32-next.

Thanks
Alex