[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9680368-fb50-fc89-48fc-2c31cf8ee614@web.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:21:40 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Matthias Männich <maennich@...gle.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [v2] coccinelle: semantic patch to check for inappropriate
do_div() calls
>> Does the dependency management around the application of SmPL disjunctions
>> need any further clarification?
>
> I already clarified it. The python code will only be executed if the
> variables that it references have values. The criterion is not just
> whether the rule r was matched.
Thanks for this information.
> To see that this is the case, all or you have to do is try it. Or read
> the Coccinelle source code.
I would prefer a software documentation format which can be easier to read.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists