[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a85f4c2-6ef8-314a-c56d-86c773d5ead0@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:24:23 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 1/7] sched/pelt.c: Add support to track thermal
pressure
On 08/01/2020 15:56, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 07:54, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/12/2019 05:11, Thara Gopinath wrote:
>>
>> minor: in subject: s/sched/pelt.c/sched/pelt
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/pelt.c b/kernel/sched/pelt.c
>>> index a96db50..9aac3b7 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/pelt.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.c
>>> @@ -353,6 +353,28 @@ int update_dl_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct rq *rq,
>> int running)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * thermal:
>>> + *
>>> + * load_sum = \Sum se->avg.load_sum
>>
>> Why not '\Sum rq->avg.load_sum' ?
>>
> Hi Dietmar,
>
> The header for all other update_*_load_avg api use se->avg. and not rq->avg.
True but at least they (rt_rq, dl_rq, irq) also say 'but
se->avg.util_sum is not tracked'.
I guess this comment originally came from the
'__update_load_avg_blocked_se(), __update_load_avg_se(),
__update_load_avg_cfs_rq()' block:
* cfq_rq:
*
* load_sum = \Sum se_weight(se) * se->avg.load_sum
but for rt_rq, dl_rq, irq and thermal we don't have a relationship like
between se and cfs_rq's so that's why this comment confuses me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists