linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RESEND v5] x86/resctrl: Add task resctrl information display

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:24:44 +0000
From:   Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
To:     Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND v5] x86/resctrl: Add task resctrl information
 display

Chen Yu writes:
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_CPU_RESCTRL
>+
>+/*
>+ * A task can only be part of one control
>+ * group and of one monitoring group which
>+ * is associated to that control group.
>+ * So one line is simple and clear enough:

Can we please avoid using the word "control group" to describe these? It's 
extremely confusing for readers since it's exactly the same word as used for 
actual cgroups, especially since those are also a form of "resource control"...

Doesn't official documentation refer to them as "resource groups" to avoid 
this?