[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200109145729.32898-15-peterx@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:57:22 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Kevin Kevin <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, peterx@...hat.com,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 14/21] KVM: Don't allocate dirty bitmap if dirty ring is enabled
Because kvm dirty rings and kvm dirty log is used in an exclusive way,
Let's avoid creating the dirty_bitmap when kvm dirty ring is enabled.
At the meantime, since the dirty_bitmap will be conditionally created
now, we can't use it as a sign of "whether this memory slot enabled
dirty tracking". Change users like that to check against the kvm
memory slot flags.
Note that there still can be chances where the kvm memory slot got its
dirty_bitmap allocated, _if_ the memory slots are created before
enabling of the dirty rings and at the same time with the dirty
tracking capability enabled, they'll still with the dirty_bitmap.
However it should not hurt much (e.g., the bitmaps will always be
freed if they are there), and the real users normally won't trigger
this because dirty bit tracking flag should in most cases only be
applied to kvm slots only before migration starts, that should be far
latter than kvm initializes (VM starts).
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
---
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 5 +++++
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index c96161c6a0c9..ab2a169b1264 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -353,6 +353,11 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot {
u8 as_id;
};
+static inline bool kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
+{
+ return slot->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
+}
+
static inline unsigned long kvm_dirty_bitmap_bytes(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
{
return ALIGN(memslot->npages, BITS_PER_LONG) / 8;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index f0f766183cb2..46da3169944f 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1120,7 +1120,8 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
}
/* Allocate page dirty bitmap if needed */
- if ((new.flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) && !new.dirty_bitmap) {
+ if ((new.flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) && !new.dirty_bitmap &&
+ !kvm->dirty_ring_size) {
if (kvm_create_dirty_bitmap(&new) < 0)
goto out_free;
}
@@ -2309,7 +2310,7 @@ static void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
gfn_t gfn)
{
- if (memslot && memslot->dirty_bitmap) {
+ if (memslot && kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(memslot)) {
unsigned long rel_gfn = gfn - memslot->base_gfn;
u32 slot = (memslot->as_id << 16) | memslot->id;
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists