[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5E174086.50004@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 10:02:30 -0500
From: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>
To: rui.zhang@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
agross@...nel.org
Cc: amit.kucheria@...durent.com, mark.rutland@....com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 0/7] Introduce Power domain based warming device driver
On 11/20/2019 07:56 AM, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> Certain resources modeled as a generic power domain in linux kernel can be
> used to warm up the SoC (mx power domain on sdm845) if the temperature
> falls below certain threshold. These power domains can be considered as
> thermal warming devices. (opposite of thermal cooling devices).
>
> In kernel, these warming devices can be modeled as a thermal cooling
> device. Since linux kernel today has no instance of a resource modeled as
> a power domain acting as a thermal warming device, a generic power domain
> based thermal warming device driver that can be used pan-Socs is the
> approach taken in this patch series. Since thermal warming devices can be
> thought of as the mirror opposite of thermal cooling devices, this patch
> series re-uses thermal cooling device framework. To use these power
> domains as warming devices require further tweaks in the thermal framework
> which are out of scope of this patch series. These tweaks have been posted
> as a separate series[1].
Hi,
Can this series be merged ? It has been acked from DT and genpd point of
view.
Warm Regards
Thara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists