lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200109164102.GA36997@xz-x1>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:41:02 -0500
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Kevin Kevin <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/21] KVM: Don't allocate dirty bitmap if dirty ring
 is enabled

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 09:57:22AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> Because kvm dirty rings and kvm dirty log is used in an exclusive way,
> Let's avoid creating the dirty_bitmap when kvm dirty ring is enabled.
> At the meantime, since the dirty_bitmap will be conditionally created
> now, we can't use it as a sign of "whether this memory slot enabled
> dirty tracking".  Change users like that to check against the kvm
> memory slot flags.
> 
> Note that there still can be chances where the kvm memory slot got its
> dirty_bitmap allocated, _if_ the memory slots are created before
> enabling of the dirty rings and at the same time with the dirty
> tracking capability enabled, they'll still with the dirty_bitmap.
> However it should not hurt much (e.g., the bitmaps will always be
> freed if they are there), and the real users normally won't trigger
> this because dirty bit tracking flag should in most cases only be
> applied to kvm slots only before migration starts, that should be far
> latter than kvm initializes (VM starts).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h | 5 +++++
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 5 +++--
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index c96161c6a0c9..ab2a169b1264 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -353,6 +353,11 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot {
>  	u8 as_id;
>  };
>  
> +static inline bool kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +{
> +	return slot->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
> +}
> +
>  static inline unsigned long kvm_dirty_bitmap_bytes(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
>  {
>  	return ALIGN(memslot->npages, BITS_PER_LONG) / 8;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index f0f766183cb2..46da3169944f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1120,7 +1120,8 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Allocate page dirty bitmap if needed */
> -	if ((new.flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) && !new.dirty_bitmap) {
> +	if ((new.flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) && !new.dirty_bitmap &&
> +	    !kvm->dirty_ring_size) {
>  		if (kvm_create_dirty_bitmap(&new) < 0)
>  			goto out_free;
>  	}
> @@ -2309,7 +2310,7 @@ static void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
>  				    struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>  				    gfn_t gfn)
>  {
> -	if (memslot && memslot->dirty_bitmap) {
> +	if (memslot && kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(memslot)) {
>  		unsigned long rel_gfn = gfn - memslot->base_gfn;
>  		u32 slot = (memslot->as_id << 16) | memslot->id;
>  
> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 

I think below should be squashed as well into this patch:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 621b842a9b7b..0806bd12d8ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static inline bool memslot_valid_for_gpte(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 {
        if (!slot || slot->flags & KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID)
                return false;
-       if (no_dirty_log && slot->dirty_bitmap)
+       if (no_dirty_log && kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(slot))
                return false;
  
        return true;

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ