[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2001091142281.1307-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:46:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: syzbot <syzbot+10e5f68920f13587ab12@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
cc: andreyknvl@...gle.com, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<gustavo@...eddedor.com>, <ingrassia@...genesys.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING in usbhid_raw_request/usb_submit_urb (2)
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger
> crash:
>
> Reported-and-tested-by:
> syzbot+10e5f68920f13587ab12@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> Tested on:
>
> commit: ecdf2214 usb: gadget: add raw-gadget interface
> git tree: https://github.com/google/kasan.git
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=b06a019075333661
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=10e5f68920f13587ab12
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=1583963ee00000
>
> Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only.
I'm at a loss for a way to track this down any farther. The difference
between this patch and the previous was very small and almost entirely
confined to actions that take place _after_ the bug condition has been
detected.
If this is indeed caused by a race, it would be nice to know that the
two racing threads are doing. One of them we can see in the log output
(it's calling usb_control_msg) but the other is a mystery.
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists