[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200109164847.GF31792@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 18:48:47 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, hyun.kwon@...inx.com, vkoul@...nel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
michal.simek@...inx.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: xilinx: Use dma_request_chan() instead
dma_request_slave_channel()
Hi Peter,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:42:35PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan()
> eating up the error code.
>
> By using dma_request_chan() directly the driver can support deferred
> probing against DMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Vinod, could you please pick this up ?
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-dma.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-dma.c b/drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-dma.c
> index b211380a11f2..9ce515ff9c0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-dma.c
> @@ -725,10 +725,10 @@ int xvip_dma_init(struct xvip_composite_device *xdev, struct xvip_dma *dma,
>
> /* ... and the DMA channel. */
> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "port%u", port);
> - dma->dma = dma_request_slave_channel(dma->xdev->dev, name);
> - if (dma->dma == NULL) {
> + dma->dma = dma_request_chan(dma->xdev->dev, name);
> + if (IS_ERR(dma->dma)) {
> dev_err(dma->xdev->dev, "no VDMA channel found\n");
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> + ret = PTR_ERR(dma->dma);
> goto error;
> }
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists