linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: add sama5d3 pmc driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 09 Jan 2020 10:19:09 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: add sama5d3 pmc driver

Quoting Alexandre Belloni (2020-01-08 03:02:18)
> On 05/01/2020 19:09:04-0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > +       return;
> > > +
> > > +err_free:
> > > +       pmc_data_free(sama5d3_pmc);
> > > +}
> > > +CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(sama5d3_pmc, "atmel,sama5d3-pmc", sama5d3_pmc_setup);
> > 
> > Any reason this can't be a platform driver?
> > 
> 
> As for the other PMC driver, we need a few of the peripheral clocks very
> early which means that we would have to register most of the clock tree
> registered early leaving only a few clocks to be registered by a
> platform driver.
> 

What peripheral clks? Can you add a comment to the code?