[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aefe7c78-6bd9-bafd-9215-5784f8168400@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 19:34:04 +0100
From: saravanan sekar <sravanhome@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
mripard@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
sam@...nborg.org, icenowy@...c.io,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, davem@...emloft.net,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] regulator: mpq7920: add mpq7920 regulator driver
On 09/01/20 2:28 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 12:25:47PM +0100, Saravanan Sekar wrote:
>> Adding regulator driver for the device mpq7920.
>> The MPQ7920 PMIC device contains four DC-DC buck converters and
>> five regulators, is designed for automotive and accessed over I2C.
> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
Means should I rebase this v6 patch to linux-next and send, or
of_parse_cb callback changes as separate patch on top of v5?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists