[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200109190547.GF89495@google.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:05:47 -0800
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Rocky Liao <rjliao@...eaurora.org>
Cc: marcel@...tmann.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add qca_power_on() API to support
both wcn399x and Rome power up
Hi Rocky,
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:14:27PM +0800, Rocky Liao wrote:
> This patch adds a unified API qca_power_on() to support both wcn399x and
> Rome power on. For wcn399x it calls the qca_wcn3990_init() to init the
> regulators, and for Rome it pulls up the bt_en GPIO to power up the btsoc.
> It also moves all the power up operation from hdev->open() to
> hdev->setup().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rocky Liao <rjliao@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2: None
> Changes in v3:
> -combined the changes of patch 2 and 3 into this patch
it would be better to actually describe what was done, "patch 2 and 3"
doesn't provide much useful information.
> -updated the commit message
>
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> index 82e4cd4b6663..427e381a08b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,6 @@ static int qca_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
> {
> struct qca_serdev *qcadev;
> struct qca_data *qca;
> - int ret;
>
> BT_DBG("hu %p qca_open", hu);
>
> @@ -582,23 +581,10 @@ static int qca_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
> hu->priv = qca;
>
> if (hu->serdev) {
> -
> qcadev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(hu->serdev);
> - if (!qca_is_wcn399x(qcadev->btsoc_type)) {
> - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(qcadev->bt_en, 1);
> - /* Controller needs time to bootup. */
> - msleep(150);
> - } else {
> + if (qca_is_wcn399x(qcadev->btsoc_type)) {
> hu->init_speed = qcadev->init_speed;
> hu->oper_speed = qcadev->oper_speed;
> - ret = qca_regulator_enable(qcadev);
> - if (ret) {
> - destroy_workqueue(qca->workqueue);
> - kfree_skb(qca->rx_skb);
> - hu->priv = NULL;
> - kfree(qca);
> - return ret;
> - }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1531,6 +1517,31 @@ static int qca_wcn3990_init(struct hci_uart *hu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int qca_power_on(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> + struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
> + enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type = qca_soc_type(hu);
> + struct qca_serdev *qcadev;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /* Non-serdev device usually is powered by external power
> + * and don't need additional action in driver for power on
> + */
> + if (!hu->serdev)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (qca_is_wcn399x(soc_type)) {
> + ret = qca_wcn3990_init(hu);
Since there is no real need to add the qca_regulator_enable() call from
qca_open() here qca_power_on() is now essentially a fancy wrapper for
qca_wcn3990_init(), but I guess that's ok.
> + } else {
> + qcadev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(hu->serdev);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(qcadev->bt_en, 1);
> + /* Controller needs time to bootup. */
> + msleep(150);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
> {
> struct hci_dev *hdev = hu->hdev;
> @@ -1562,7 +1573,7 @@ static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
> set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_NON_PERSISTENT_SETUP, &hdev->quirks);
> set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_USE_BDADDR_PROPERTY, &hdev->quirks);
> hu->hdev->shutdown = qca_power_off;
> - ret = qca_wcn3990_init(hu);
> + ret = qca_power_on(hdev);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1571,6 +1582,9 @@ static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
> return ret;
> } else {
> bt_dev_info(hdev, "ROME setup");
> + ret = qca_power_on(hdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> qca_set_speed(hu, QCA_INIT_SPEED);
> }
It would be nice if we could get away with a single qca_power_on() call
for WCN399x and ROME. How about this before 'if (qca_is_wcn399x(soc_type))':
bt_dev_info(hdev, "setting up %s",
qca_is_wcn399x(soc_type)? "wcn399x" : "ROME");
ret = qca_power_on(hdev);
if (ret)
return ret;
In any case:
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists