[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200109201644.34c6b936@xps13>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 20:16:44 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Cc: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>, <jic23@...nel.org>,
<knaack.h@....de>, <lars@...afoo.de>, <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
<mchehab@...nel.org>, <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<richard.genoud@...il.com>, <radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro>,
<tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
<wg@...ndegger.com>, <mkl@...gutronix.de>, <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] dt-bindings: atmel-nand: add
microchip,sam9x60-pmecc
Hi Claudiu,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com> wrote on Wed, 8 Jan 2020
14:55:14 +0200:
> Add microchip,sam9x60-pmecc to DT bindings documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> index 68b51dc58816..3aa297c97ab6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ Required properties:
> "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmecc"
> "atmel,sama5d4-pmecc"
> "atmel,sama5d2-pmecc"
> + "microchip,sam9x60-pmecc"
> - reg: should contain 2 register ranges. The first one is pointing to the PMECC
> block, and the second one to the PMECC_ERRLOC block.
>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists