linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 12/21] KVM: X86: Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200109143620-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:36:56 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Kevin Kevin <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Lei Cao <lei.cao@...atus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/21] KVM: X86: Implement ring-based dirty memory
 tracking

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 02:21:16PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 09:56:10AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > > +Dirty GFNs (Guest Frame Numbers) are stored in the dirty_gfns array.
> > > > +For each of the dirty entry it's defined as:
> > > > +
> > > > +struct kvm_dirty_gfn {
> > > > +        __u32 pad;  
> > > 
> > > How about sticking a length here?
> > > This way huge pages can be dirtied in one go.
> > 
> > Not just huge pages, but any contiguous range of dirty pages could be
> > reported far more concisely.  Thanks,
> 
> I replied in the other thread on why I thought KVM might not suite
> that (while vfio may).
> 
> Actually we can even do that for KVM as long as we keep a per-vcpu
> last-dirtied GFN range cache (so we don't publish a dirty GFN right
> after it's dirtied), then we grow that cached dirtied range as long as
> the continuous next/previous page is dirtied.  If we found that the
> current dirty GFN is not continuous to the cached range, we publish
> the cached range and let the new GFN be the starting of last-dirtied
> GFN range cache.
> 
> However I am not sure how much we'll gain from it.  Maybe we can do
> that when we have a real use case for it.  For now I'm not sure
> whether it would worth the effort.
> 
> Thanks,

I agree for the implementation but I think UAPI should support that
from ground up so we don't need to support two kinds of formats.

> -- 
> Peter Xu