linux-kernel - Re: SLUB: purpose of sysfs events on cache creation/removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200109114415.cf01bd3ad30c5c4aec981653@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:44:15 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: SLUB: purpose of sysfs events on cache creation/removal

On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:52:36 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Mon 06-01-20 15:51:26, Cristopher Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed 04-12-19 18:32:24, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > [Cc akpm - the email thread starts
> > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191126121901.GE20912@dhcp22.suse.cz]
> > >
> > > ping.
> > 
> > There does not seem to be much of an interest in the patch?
> 
> It seems it has just fallen through cracks.

I looked at it - there wasn't really any compelling followup.

If this change should be pursued then can we please have a formal
resend?