[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200109195600.GA14884@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 19:56:04 +0000
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm: kmem: remove duplicate definitions of
__memcg_kmem_(un)charge()
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 11:40:55AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:27:39 -0800 Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
>
> > For some reason these inline functions are defined twice. Remove
> > the second identical copy.
>
> Don't think so - that wouldn't have compiled.
>
> > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > @@ -1438,15 +1438,6 @@ static inline void memcg_kmem_uncharge(struct page *page, int order)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > -static inline int __memcg_kmem_charge(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order)
> > -{
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline void __memcg_kmem_uncharge(struct page *page, int order)
> > -{
> > -}
> > -
> > #define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx) \
> > for (; NULL; )
> >
>
> Maybe you confused these with memcg_kmem_charge() and
> memcg_kmem_uncharge()?
You're right, I'm blind. Let me drop this patch and resend the series.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists