linux-kernel - Re: SLUB: purpose of sysfs events on cache creation/removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:15:08 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: SLUB: purpose of sysfs events on cache creation/removal

On Thu 09-01-20 11:44:15, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:52:36 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon 06-01-20 15:51:26, Cristopher Lameter wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Wed 04-12-19 18:32:24, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > [Cc akpm - the email thread starts
> > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191126121901.GE20912@dhcp22.suse.cz]
> > > >
> > > > ping.
> > > 
> > > There does not seem to be much of an interest in the patch?
> > 
> > It seems it has just fallen through cracks.
> 
> I looked at it - there wasn't really any compelling followup.

Btw. I would appreciate if this was explicit because if there is no
reaction then it is not clear whether the patch has slipped through
cracks or it is not worth pursuing for whatever reason.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs