[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb27a03b-1c3d-567b-caf3-7b0e4a039f6d@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:39:10 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
knut.omang@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kunit] kunit: building kunit as a module breaks
allmodconfig
Hi Alan,
On 1/10/20 4:49 AM, Alan Maguire wrote:
> kunit tests that do not support module build should depend
> on KUNIT=y rather than just KUNIT in Kconfig, otherwise
> they will trigger compilation errors for "make allmodconfig"
> builds.
>
> Fixes: 9fe124bf1b77 ("kunit: allow kunit to be loaded as a module")
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Thanks for fixing this quickly. For future reference, Signed-off-by
should be last. I fixed it and applied the patch.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists