lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWr2HLkW=ZSjZmiOpJyUG7T1QaWQOSW7vi34hqd2L4Bmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 20:51:51 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: avoid blocking lock_page() in kcompactd

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 5:01 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> I tried to dump the process stacks after we saw the hung task
> with /proc/X/stack (apparently sysrq is not an option for production),
> but I didn't find anything useful. I didn't see any other process
> hung in lock_page() either, all mm-related kernel threads were sleeping
> (non-D) at the time I debugged. So, it is possible there was some place
> missing a unlock_page() too, which is too late to debug after the hung
> task was reported.

Never mind. I found the process locking the page, /proc/X/stack apparently
fools me by hiding page fault stack. :-/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ