[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200110001124.8B82B20661@mail.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:11:23 -0800
From: sboyd@...nel.org
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: add sama5d3 pmc driver
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Quoting Alexandre Belloni (2020-01-09 13:41:28)
> On 09/01/2020 10:19:09-0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Alexandre Belloni (2020-01-08 03:02:18)
> > >
> > > As for the other PMC driver, we need a few of the peripheral clocks very
> > > early which means that we would have to register most of the clock tree
> > > registered early leaving only a few clocks to be registered by a
> > > platform driver.
> > >
> >
> > What peripheral clks? Can you add a comment to the code?
> >
>
> The TCB is used as the clocksource so its clock is needed. Its parent is
> the master clock which has UTMI, PLLA, the mainclock and the slow clock
> as parents so by that point, most of the tree is registered.
>
What in sama5d3_periphck[] is in that list? I still don't see why
platform device is rejected here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists