linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: add sama5d3 pmc driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:11:23 -0800
From:   sboyd@...nel.org
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: add sama5d3 pmc driver

From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>

Quoting Alexandre Belloni (2020-01-09 13:41:28)
> On 09/01/2020 10:19:09-0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Alexandre Belloni (2020-01-08 03:02:18)
> > > 
> > > As for the other PMC driver, we need a few of the peripheral clocks very
> > > early which means that we would have to register most of the clock tree
> > > registered early leaving only a few clocks to be registered by a
> > > platform driver.
> > > 
> > 
> > What peripheral clks? Can you add a comment to the code?
> > 
> 
> The TCB is used as the clocksource so its clock is needed. Its parent is
> the master clock which has UTMI, PLLA, the mainclock and the slow clock
> as parents so by that point, most of the tree is registered.
> 

What in sama5d3_periphck[] is in that list? I still don't see why
platform device is rejected here.