[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <607e395f-21ce-3c9f-eff7-2fa6aaa74595@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:34:59 +0200
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
mathias.nyman@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu
Cc: acelan.kao@...onical.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xhci: Ensure link state is U3 after setting
USB_SS_PORT_LS_U3
On 3.1.2020 10.40, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> The xHCI spec doesn't specify the upper bound of U3 transition time. For
> some devices 20ms is not enough, so we need to make sure the link state
> is in U3 before further actions.
Looking at the USB 3.2 spec (7.2.4.2 Link Power management and Flow) it seems
most timers related to U3 entry are a lot less than a millisecond (4-16us)
If port is in U1/U2, Ux_EXIT_TIMER is 6ms which seems to be the longest timeout.
If we anyway are polling for the U3 state we could shorten the initial 20ms sleep
down to 10ms. I think many devices, especially if they are already in U0
could manage this.
are >
> I've tried to use U3 Entry Capability by setting U3 Entry Enable in
> config register, however the port change event for U3 transition
> interrupts the system suspend process.
>
> For now let's use the less ideal method by polling PLS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
> index 7a3a29e5e9d2..2b2e9d004dbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
> @@ -1228,6 +1228,7 @@ int xhci_hub_control(struct usb_hcd *hcd, u16 typeReq, u16 wValue,
> break;
> case USB_PORT_FEAT_LINK_STATE:
> temp = readl(ports[wIndex]->addr);
> + xhci_dbg(xhci, "before setting link state, actual port %d-%d status = 0x%0x\n", hcd->self.busnum, wIndex + 1, temp);
xhci_set_link_state() already shows similar debugging,
> /* Disable port */
> if (link_state == USB_SS_PORT_LS_SS_DISABLED) {
> xhci_dbg(xhci, "Disable port %d\n", wIndex);
> @@ -1316,9 +1317,17 @@ int xhci_hub_control(struct usb_hcd *hcd, u16 typeReq, u16 wValue,
> msleep(20); /* wait device to enter */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags);
>
> - temp = readl(ports[wIndex]->addr);
> - if (link_state == USB_SS_PORT_LS_U3)
> + if (link_state == USB_SS_PORT_LS_U3) {
> + retval = xhci_handshake(ports[wIndex]->addr, PORT_PLS_MASK, XDEV_U3, 80 * 1000);
> + if (retval)
> + xhci_dbg(xhci, "polling XDEV_U3 on port %d-%d timeout\n", hcd->self.busnum, wIndex + 1);
In worst case we are busylooping for 80ms here, keeping the cpu busy.
It should be ok to sleep here, so how about just reading the register
every 10ms max 10 times, sleeping in between.
-Mathias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists