[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26343594.6IAkRYhI4F@kreacher>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:43:23 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] intel_idle: Eliminate __setup_broadcast_timer()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
The __setup_broadcast_timer() static function is only called in one
place and "true" is passed to it as the argument in there, so
effectively it is a wrapper arround tick_broadcast_enable().
To simplify the code, call tick_broadcast_enable() directly instead
of __setup_broadcast_timer() and drop the latter.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
@@ -967,14 +967,6 @@ static bool intel_idle_verify_cstate(uns
return true;
}
-static void __setup_broadcast_timer(bool on)
-{
- if (on)
- tick_broadcast_enable();
- else
- tick_broadcast_disable();
-}
-
static void auto_demotion_disable(void)
{
unsigned long long msr_bits;
@@ -1624,7 +1616,7 @@ static int intel_idle_cpu_online(unsigne
struct cpuidle_device *dev;
if (lapic_timer_reliable_states != LAPIC_TIMER_ALWAYS_RELIABLE)
- __setup_broadcast_timer(true);
+ tick_broadcast_enable();
/*
* Some systems can hotplug a cpu at runtime after
Powered by blists - more mailing lists