linux-kernel - Re: Applied "ASoC: max98090: fix incorrect helper in max98090_dapm_put_enum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200110132501.GA5889@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:25:01 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Dylan Reid <dgreid@...gle.com>,
        Jimmy Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@...gle.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Applied "ASoC: max98090: fix incorrect helper in
 max98090_dapm_put_enum_double()" to the asoc tree

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

> This patch has been applied twice. First time for the 
> max98090_dapm_put_enum_double() function (as it has been designed), 
> second time for max98090_put_enum_double(), what is completely wrong 
> thing (it does exactly the opposite thing).

> Mark, please revert/drop 4e93c1294f4b051d574d6bc59755d2863286990e commit.

OK.  For things like this it's generally easiest to just send a revert
that can be directly applied.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)