lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200110015651.14887-6-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:56:51 +0000
From:   Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
To:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...e.de, tony.luck@...el.com,
        x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] EDAC/amd64: Drop some family checks for newer systems

From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>

In general, "pvt->umc != NULL" is used to check if the system is Family
17h+. However, there are a few places that are using direct family
checks.

Replace the remaining family checks with a check for "pvt->umc != NULL".

Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
---
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 2488cbf76814..4fc9f0b06ed7 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int __set_scrub_rate(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u32 new_bw, u32 min_rate)
 
 	scrubval = scrubrates[i].scrubval;
 
-	if (pvt->fam == 0x17 || pvt->fam == 0x18) {
+	if (pvt->umc) {
 		__f17h_set_scrubval(pvt, scrubval);
 	} else if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60) {
 		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
@@ -256,18 +256,7 @@ static int get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 	int i, retval = -EINVAL;
 	u32 scrubval = 0;
 
-	switch (pvt->fam) {
-	case 0x15:
-		/* Erratum #505 */
-		if (pvt->model < 0x10)
-			f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
-
-		if (pvt->model == 0x60)
-			amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
-		break;
-
-	case 0x17:
-	case 0x18:
+	if (pvt->umc) {
 		amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F6, F17H_SCR_BASE_ADDR, &scrubval);
 		if (scrubval & BIT(0)) {
 			amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F6, F17H_SCR_LIMIT_ADDR, &scrubval);
@@ -276,11 +265,15 @@ static int get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 		} else {
 			scrubval = 0;
 		}
-		break;
+	} else if (pvt->fam == 0x15) {
+		/* Erratum #505 */
+		if (pvt->model < 0x10)
+			f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
 
-	default:
+		if (pvt->model == 0x60)
+			amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
+	} else {
 		amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
-		break;
 	}
 
 	scrubval = scrubval & 0x001F;
@@ -1055,6 +1048,16 @@ static void determine_memory_type(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
 {
 	u32 dram_ctrl, dcsm;
 
+	if (pvt->umc) {
+		if ((pvt->umc[0].dimm_cfg | pvt->umc[1].dimm_cfg) & BIT(5))
+			pvt->dram_type = MEM_LRDDR4;
+		else if ((pvt->umc[0].dimm_cfg | pvt->umc[1].dimm_cfg) & BIT(4))
+			pvt->dram_type = MEM_RDDR4;
+		else
+			pvt->dram_type = MEM_DDR4;
+		return;
+	}
+
 	switch (pvt->fam) {
 	case 0xf:
 		if (pvt->ext_model >= K8_REV_F)
@@ -1100,16 +1103,6 @@ static void determine_memory_type(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
 	case 0x16:
 		goto ddr3;
 
-	case 0x17:
-	case 0x18:
-		if ((pvt->umc[0].dimm_cfg | pvt->umc[1].dimm_cfg) & BIT(5))
-			pvt->dram_type = MEM_LRDDR4;
-		else if ((pvt->umc[0].dimm_cfg | pvt->umc[1].dimm_cfg) & BIT(4))
-			pvt->dram_type = MEM_RDDR4;
-		else
-			pvt->dram_type = MEM_DDR4;
-		return;
-
 	default:
 		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "%s: Family??? 0x%x\n", __func__, pvt->fam);
 		pvt->dram_type = MEM_EMPTY;
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ