[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200110134236.GM2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:42:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
valentin.schneider@....com, qperret@...gle.com,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@...bug.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Add a new sysctl to control uclamp_util_min
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:00:58PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> On 01/08/20 14:44, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Did cpu_uclamp_write() forget to check for input<0 ?
>
> Hmm just tried that and it seems so
>
> # echo -1 > cpu.uclamp.min
> # cat cpu.uclamp.min
> 42949671.96
>
> capacity_from_percent(); we check for
>
> 7301 if (req.percent > UCLAMP_PERCENT_SCALE) {
> 7302 req.ret = -ERANGE;
> 7303 return req;
> 7304 }
>
> But req.percent is s64, maybe it should be u64?
if ((u64)req.percent > UCLAMP_PERCENT_SCALE)
should do, I think.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists