[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91abb141-57b8-7659-25ec-8080e290d846@web.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 17:35:21 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Matthias Männich <maennich@...gle.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] coccinelle: semantic patch to check for inappropriate
do_div() calls
> +@...tialize:python@
…
> +def filter_out_safe_constants(str):
…
> +def construct_warnings(str, suggested_fun):
* I suggest once more to adjust the dependency specifications for the usage
of these functions by SmPL rules.
* Can the local variable “msg” be omitted?
> +coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], construct_warnings("div64_ul"))
I suggest again to move the prefix “div64_” into the string literal
of the function implementation.
The SmPL code for two disjunctions could become shorter.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists